On March 9, 2018, Zhou Xiaochuan, Governor of PBoC, called for those behind such efforts to be cautious – and not to grow too fast.
“For blockchain projects with technological potentials, they should conduct thorough testing before rolling out services. Otherwise, a reckless expansion may incur serious security and financial stability issues,” Zhou said.
According to latest local media reports, one of the platforms that have been targeted by law enforcement authorities is . The social messaging platform, which is actually quite popular in China was ordered by authorities to shut down the accounts of several digital currency exchanges including OKEx’s account, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world with a $1.7 bln daily trading volume. And that is not all. Reportedly, authorities have also asked banks to suspend service to clients who have engaged in cryptocurrency trading.
It’s part of a concerted effort by agencies including the central bank, the cyberspace administration and China’s
. Following reports of the latest crackdown, advertisements for cryptocurrencies have stopped appearing on Baidu, China’s biggest search engine, and social media platform Weibo.According to The Meitu founder, Cai
, the majority of the world’s mines are located in China,“80%” of the world’s bitcoins are produced by hardware housed in China.” The miners can access very cheap electricity produced by hydroelectric power stations. And at the same time, Chinese miners also have an incentive to produce bitcoin regardless of cost because it allows them to send money overseas and evade the government’s capital controls. Four out of the five largest bitcoin “mining pools” in the world are Chinese, according to data from Blockchain.According to Wensheng, China should use bitcoin mining surplus power for productive purposes, stating that “China’s surplus power [can be used]to produce bitcoin, [which can be]sold to the
, , and Americans” – making China “a bitcoin foreign exchange earner.” However, Wensheng also warns that if bitcoin miners are “forced overseas [to]Iceland, Chinese people will need to spend a lot on foreign exchanges to buy back bitcoin.”According to the Australian Bitcoin investor and analyst, Silvain Ribes, Chinese crypto exchanges seem to be bogus, and the overall worst appears to be OKEx, supposedly the world’s number one exchange by volume, which might be faking over 90% of its volume. He reached the conclusion of what was meant to be an unrelated study of price slippage. Speaking in the same tone, Wensheng compared the ICO markets to the dotcom bubble of the nineteen-nineties, stating that of the “hundreds of companies” that listed Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) “in 1999” very “few companies are left,” however, “One Amazon is enough” – implying that heavy-handed restrictions on ICOs may result in China failing to facilitate the growth of potential major companies that could emerge through the disruptive ICO sector.
The rise of a global tide of crackdowns on cryptocurrencies
In Hong Kong, the
(SFC) in February 2018, sent letters to all seven digital currency platforms as well as firms attempting to raise funds through initial coin offerings (ICOs), warning that they are ready to pass cases of potential fraud to the police for investigation. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the SFC, regard cryptocurrencies not as legal tender, money or currencies, but as “virtual commodities”, which are not subject to regulation, provided the cryptocurrency in question does not have the characteristics of a “security”. Such ambiguous definition is pushing a number of Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency trader towards U.S.-based bitcoin futures. The shift away from domestic markets has been spurred by a perception that the American futures markets receive greater regulatory oversight than Hong Kong’s unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges.In Japan, two exchanges — FSHO and bit station — were instructed to halt operations for a month, Japan’s
In the United States, the staff of the Divisions of Enforcement and Trading and Markets of the Securities and Exchange ( ) issued a public statement on March 7, 2018, regarding exchanges and other secondary trading platforms that list and/or facilitate the trading of coins and tokens online. The statement emphasizes that platforms offering the trading of digital assets that are securities, including many (if not all) coins and tokens issued through ICOs, must register with the SEC as a national securities exchange or operate under an exemption from such registration. The SEC statement addresses an apparently widespread misunderstanding that industry participants could operate such online coin or token exchanges without registering as an exchange, an alternative trading system (ATS), or broker-dealer. As a part of ramped up efforts to curb fraud related to virtual currencies, some of America’s biggest banks recently banned their customers from buying bitcoin and other tokens using their credit cards.
In Europe, the
In , trading on bitcoin exchanges has dropped as much as 90% in the last two months as regulatory concerns lead to uncertainty about the cryptocurrency that is not yet regarded as legal tender in the country. Even though the (RBI) has not mandated the closure of any accounts, Indian banks are tightening the noose on two fronts: shutting bitcoin exchange accounts and restricting customers transacting in cryptocurrencies. This has led to reduced transactions on bitcoin exchanges, mirroring a global trend. In December 2017, Indian income tax authorities conducted on-premise searches of nine bitcoin exchanges seeking information on customers who transacted on their platforms. Following the searches, in January 2018, IT department served notices to 100,000 people believed to have made high –volume transactions.